notes
Don't work with people who are not serious about their work
Don't work with people who don't take things seriously.
What determines how to do it
I have been doing product architecture for many years. A key word in summary: What determines how to do it.
Therefore, if you want to build a good product architecture, you must fundamentally understand the essence of what you want to do.
What to do with whom
There were many years when I only looked at doing things.
However, after experiencing a lot, I value "who" more.
If people are not good enough, things cannot be done well.
There is a kind of separation
For some deceptions, just give them up. To avoid losing more.
For those who deliberately conceal something, causing something bad to happen. This is no different than deception.
A gentleman is useless
A gentleman has no tools.
This is a curse word. There are no curse words, but the scolding is very severe.
Thanks to Mr. Kong for scolding many people for me more than two thousand years ago.
How to fall in love with wind
How to fall in love with wind
The wind will extinguish the candle, but it will make the fire burn brighter and stronger.
The same goes for randomness, uncertainty, and chaos: you exploit them, not avoid them. You want to be a fire, longing to be blown by the wind. This sums up my clear attitude towards randomness and uncertainty.
——Excerpted from "Antifragility: Benefiting from Uncertainty"
Companies are used to allocate resources and wealth
Companies are used to allocate resources and wealth.
A successful company has established an efficient and reasonable resource and wealth distribution rule.
The company is used for distributing resources and wealth.
So, a successful company was established a effcient and reasonable resources and wealth distribution rules.
An idea for routing access control
By configuring corresponding parameters for one or more parameters of the route, precise and flexible control of access to routes and resources is achieved.
There is no need to configure the entire route to control routing. It's not flexible enough, and it can't be too precise.
Excellent people and mediocre people
Excellent people can always see the excellence in others, even if that other person doesn't even notice his own excellence.
A mediocre person can always see mediocrity in others, even if the mediocrity he sees is actually excellence.
Allocate resources to users and allocate users to resources
Two ideas to solve the problem:
- Allocate resources to users
- Allocate resources to users
A few days ago, a classmate asked this question in a classmate group: There are eight people working in two shifts, a 12-hour system, and one person often works the day shift. Five people are required to be on duty every day. How to schedule the shifts? I am waiting online urgently. Can I ask for an expert? . (Note: A regular day shift means only day shift. If there are five people on duty every day, it means a total of five people on day shift plus night shift)
This is how I understand it:
Allocate resources to users. (Day shift and black shift count as resources)
Another classmate explained it this way:
Allocate resources to users, that is, day shift and black shift,
Two very typical ideas.
One is user-centered and allocates resources to users.
The other is resource-centered and allocates resources to users.
These are also two common ideas when making products.
User-centered products tend to have a better user experience.
Resource-centered products tend to make the most efficient use of resources.
It doesn't matter whether it's good or bad, it depends on which one is suitable for the specific scenario.
