Aside
What to do with whom
There were many years when I only looked at doing things.
However, after experiencing a lot, I value "who" more.
If people are not good enough, things cannot be done well.
There is a kind of separation
For some deceptions, just give them up. To avoid losing more.
For those who deliberately conceal something, causing something bad to happen. This is no different than deception.
A gentleman is useless
A gentleman has no tools.
This is a curse word. There are no curse words, but the scolding is very severe.
Thanks to Mr. Kong for scolding many people for me more than two thousand years ago.
How to fall in love with wind
How to fall in love with wind
The wind will extinguish the candle, but it will make the fire burn brighter and stronger.
The same goes for randomness, uncertainty, and chaos: you exploit them, not avoid them. You want to be a fire, longing to be blown by the wind. This sums up my clear attitude towards randomness and uncertainty.
——Excerpted from "Antifragility: Benefiting from Uncertainty"
Companies are used to allocate resources and wealth
Companies are used to allocate resources and wealth.
A successful company has established an efficient and reasonable resource and wealth distribution rule.
The company is used for distributing resources and wealth.
So, a successful company was established a effcient and reasonable resources and wealth distribution rules.
An idea for routing access control
By configuring corresponding parameters for one or more parameters of the route, precise and flexible control of access to routes and resources is achieved.
There is no need to configure the entire route to control routing. It's not flexible enough, and it can't be too precise.
Excellent people and mediocre people
Excellent people can always see the excellence in others, even if that other person doesn't even notice his own excellence.
A mediocre person can always see mediocrity in others, even if the mediocrity he sees is actually excellence.
Allocate resources to users and allocate users to resources
Two ideas to solve the problem:
- Allocate resources to users
- Allocate resources to users
A few days ago, a classmate asked this question in a classmate group: There are eight people working in two shifts, a 12-hour system, and one person often works the day shift. Five people are required to be on duty every day. How to schedule the shifts? I am waiting online urgently. Can I ask for an expert? . (Note: A regular day shift means only day shift. If there are five people on duty every day, it means a total of five people on day shift plus night shift)
This is how I understand it:
Allocate resources to users. (Day shift and black shift count as resources)
Another classmate explained it this way:
Allocate resources to users, that is, day shift and black shift,
Two very typical ideas.
One is user-centered and allocates resources to users.
The other is resource-centered and allocates resources to users.
These are also two common ideas when making products.
User-centered products tend to have a better user experience.
Resource-centered products tend to make the most efficient use of resources.
It doesn't matter whether it's good or bad, it depends on which one is suitable for the specific scenario.
Tian Ji’s horse racing was a defeat
Tian Ji's horse racing was a defeat.
We all know the story of Tian Ji’s horse racing.
The dismounted horse versus the mounted horse, the mounted horse versus the middle horse, the middle horse versus the dismounted horse. In the end it was three to two, and the one without the better horse won.
"Tian Ji Horse Racing" is so smart. So clever that we have been following him for thousands of years.
Therefore, with "Tian Ji Horse Racing", you can win even if you don't have a good horse.
Therefore, as long as there is "Tian Ji Horse Racing", it will be enough.
A good horse? What is that? It takes time and money.
However, the core competitiveness of an enterprise will not be "Tian Ji horse racing" after all. Therefore, those who pursue "Tian Ji Horse Racing" will eventually lose.
After all, we still need "good horses" to win users and the market.
The core idea in "Sun Tzu's Art of War" is one sentence: To be in an invincible position without losing the enemy's defeat.
To put it simply, it is: use the right combination to win with the unexpected.
The prerequisite for winning by surprise is to achieve justice. Otherwise, winning by surprise becomes a pure gamble.
Whether we are making products or businesses, we still need to raise a "good horse" to be invincible before we can consider "Tian Ji horse racing" to win by surprise.
Management is to ignore
Management is about not caring.
All management "for management" and "for management" will ultimately fail and go in the opposite direction.
